Sunday, 4 May 2014

What Price Democracy?

Where is the difference between the 500 Club, that Mr Middleton manages for WA Liberals, and the Eightbyfive fund that benefited the NSW Liberals, or the fund that Joe Hockey is trying to explain away today?


The Perth based 500 Club is a club that can only be joined by invitation from a current member.

“To become a member of The 500 Club, you need to be referred by an existing member. This process ensures members are proactively interested in the Club’s activities and aims. 
  
It takes donations from members and then distributes them to the politicians in return for ....what?

The following are a few extracts from Hansard that indicate some views of how the funds are used;

“Why did the proponents of the Gnarabup Beach development donate to his campaign? Maybe the member for Vasse knows more about the issue that the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure raised yesterday when she pointed out that the Smiths Beach proponents were delivered a huge windfall benefit by the Liberal Party in government after it received a donation from the developers. If that is not improper and if it does not sniff of corruption, what does? Does it matter?

The member for Cottesloe – he has all the answers – should tell us about the donations to the Liberal Party’s 500 Club or is that just a vehicle for corruption? If it is not, the Leader of the Liberal Party should demand that the state Liberal Party reveal to the public everybody who donates through the Liberal Party’s 500 Club. He should get it on the public record so we can all see who makes donations. Who knows whether the 500 Club is a vehicle for corruption? No-one will ever know because the Liberal Party will not tell anybody who these donors are. That is what it has said.
....
I issue a challenge to the leader of the Liberal Party: he should sack the member for Vasse. He should publicly call upon the state Liberal Party to reveal the donors to the Liberal Party’s 500 Club. Then we can hold it up against all the development applications and all the approvals. Then we will know who is involved, just as we now know that the Liberal Party received a donation from Canal Rocks Pty Ltd and made a decision that gave tremendous benefit to the Canal Rocks developers. Canal Rocks received no benefit from us. In fact, quite the contrary. It is funny, is it not?
.....
It would be great if the Liberal Party said, “Just to prove all those things wrong, here are all the people who have donated to the Liberal Party’s 500 Club.” We would all see that accountability that the Liberal Party is so proud to claim. It is not accountable; it is completely unaccountable.
23 November 2006
..........
Before I was rudely interrupted by the dinner break, I was reflecting on my colleagues’ commitment to the Liberal philosophies of small government and lower taxes. In conclusion I point out that this government has comprehensively failed in its commitment to tax reform and tax cuts. In the lead-up to the 2008 election a commitment was made to the 500 Club, in return for its $400,000 donation, to deliver $250 million in tax cuts. When that commitment was made it was to be costed and delivered by the end of the 2012–13 financial year. Instead of tax cuts a series of rebates were to be delivered six years after the government was first elected in 2008.
11 June 2013”
.....


That last quote was from a Liberal member complaining that they had paid for a promise that hadn't been delivered.

Is there any difference? 
Are we all comfortable with democracy for sale?